BINF GU4001 · COMS W4560 · Fall 2026
Assignment details
Instructions, deadlines, required content, and evaluation criteria.
Lecture Reflection Summaries 20%
Following each lecture, students are required to submit a concise reflection summary of the material covered, focusing on core concepts and key takeaways. Students should capture, connect, and question: What were the core concepts and examples? How does this lecture relate to other domains or methods? What remains unclear, contested, or worth exploring? Each summary is due by the start of the next class session and must be submitted via CourseWorks.
- Maximum length: 500 words
- Format: 12-point Times New Roman, single-spaced
- Scoring: Each summary is worth 1 point
- Flexibility: Students may miss up to 3 submissions without penalty
- Course weight: The overall score is normalized to 20% of the final grade
| Criterion | Excellent · 1 point | Incomplete · 0 points |
|---|---|---|
| Content Understanding | Clearly and accurately captures key topics, concepts, and discussions from the lecture. | Summary is missing, incomplete, or does not reflect key content. |
| Clarity and Writing | Well-organized, coherent, and clearly written. | Poorly organized or difficult to follow. |
| Originality | Written in the student’s own words without copying slides or external materials. | Largely copied or generated by unauthorized tools, including AI. |
Term Paper 40%
The term paper is a written research paper exploring a topic in biomedical informatics. It should demonstrate deep engagement with course concepts and independent research. The paper should generally be either a review of a particular issue or technology in biomedical informatics or a well-researched position paper expressing a personal view on a controversial topic in the field.
Required structure
The paper must contain labeled sections for Background, Current Approaches, Discussion, and Conclusions.
Expectations
- Develop a compelling argument about the chosen topic.
- Include at least three concrete examples.
- Identify gaps in research and support claims with citations.
- Use primarily peer-reviewed scientific literature; authoritative technical standards, government publications, and professional guidelines may also be cited when appropriate.
- Use the Discussion section to address limitations of current approaches and feasible directions for future work.
- Include your name and a title.
- Maximum length: 2,500 words, excluding figures and references.
- Format: double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman.
- Any citation style is acceptable if used consistently.
Proposal
Submit a one-paragraph proposal through CourseWorks describing the proposed term paper topic, the central question or argument you plan to address, and its relevance to biomedical informatics. The proposal is intended to ensure that the topic is appropriately scoped and aligned with the assignment.
| Criterion | Excellent · A-level | Good · B-level | Needs Improvement · C or below |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic and Scope | Focused, original, and clearly relevant to informatics. | Relevant topic but somewhat broad or underdeveloped. | Topic lacks relevance or clarity. |
| Research and Evidence | Strong use of scholarly sources with well-integrated evidence. | Adequate sources with some gaps or weak integration. | Insufficient or inappropriate sources. |
| Insight | Demonstrates critical thinking and original insights. | Some insight but primarily descriptive. | Little to no insight; mostly summary. |
| Organization and Clarity | Logical structure, clear argument, and smooth flow. | Some structural issues or unclear sections. | Disorganized and difficult to follow. |
| Writing Quality | Grammatically correct, polished, and professional. | Minor grammatical errors. | Frequent grammatical issues. |
| Citation | Sources are appropriately and consistently cited throughout. | Minor citation or formatting inconsistencies. | Sources are inadequately or inconsistently cited. |
Group Project Presentation 30%
The instructional team will assign students to groups of 3–4. Each group will design and present a computational solution addressing a biomedical problem of its choice. The project must explicitly incorporate at least two of the following domains: bioinformatics, clinical informatics, consumer health informatics, and public health informatics.
All groups must submit presentation slides in PPT, PPTX, or PDF format to CourseWorks by Monday, December 7, 2026, at 4:00 PM. Attendance is required during all final presentations except for absences covered by University policy.
Required presentation content
Each section below should have at least one dedicated slide. Additional slides are encouraged for clarity and depth.
- Modules. Explicitly state the course domains integrated.
- Problem. Clearly define the biomedical problem or question and specify whether the focus is a disease, behavior, or another biomedical issue.
- Current Approaches. Describe existing methods and clearly explain the project’s novel contribution or improvement.
- Population. Specify who benefits from the solution, such as researchers, clinicians, or patients.
- Data. Describe available data sources, their relevance, and how they can be integrated effectively.
- Methods. Outline the computational solution, methodological approach, and execution plan.
- Evaluation. Define clear criteria for assessing success, including potential outcomes and validation strategies.
- Delivery Method. Clarify the deliverable, intended audience, and how it will be provided or implemented.
| Criterion | Excellent | Good | Needs Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content | Comprehensive and clearly covers all required sections with strong depth and accuracy. | Covers required sections but with limited depth or minor inaccuracies. | Sections incomplete, superficial, or unclear. |
| Delivery | Clear, confident, engaging, and professional. | Adequate delivery, with some hesitation or minor engagement issues. | Delivery unclear, disengaged, or lacking professionalism. |
| Visual Aids | High-quality visuals that significantly enhance understanding and clarity. | Adequate visuals; minor improvements needed. | Visuals poor quality, unclear, or absent. |
| Timing and Flow | Well-paced, logically structured, and within allotted time. | Slight timing issues or minor structural concerns. | Poor pacing, significantly over/under time, or disorganized flow. |